Pilatus B4 disintegrates during inverted-flight attempt — VNE exceeded, no bail-out

Müllheim, Switzerland Pilatus B4-PC 11AF

On 16 October 1984 the pilot of a Pilatus B4-PC 11AF was fatally injured at 400-500 m AGL near Müllheim, Switzerland, when the aircraft disintegrated. After aerotow release the pilot half-rolled to inverted flight; the nose dropped 20° below horizon. Instead of rolling back upright, the pilot dived out without airbrakes. VNE was significantly exceeded; both wings failed. The pilot carried a rescue parachute but made no attempt to leave the cockpit; fatal. Cause: overspeed; contributing — insufficient preparation, recovery decision, no airbrakes deployed.

  1. Aerotow to aerobatics: The pilot aerotowed from Amlikon to about 1100 m above ground for aerobatic training, intending to practise inverted flight north of the airfield.
  2. Unstable inverted entry: After release, the pilot flew briefly straight ahead, then rolled the glider inverted via half-roll. The nose dropped 20° below horizon immediately and continued to steepen; the inverted attitude was not held.
  3. Aerobatic figure beyond training: Per BAZL guidelines, higher aerobatic figures (incl. inverted flight) should be practised with an instructor on a powered aircraft for ~1 hour before transferring to a glider — this had not happened. Per Cumulus Amlikon's club rules, higher figures additionally require approval from the flight-instructor conference — this approval was not sought. Inverted flight was not part of the pilot's aerobatic-extension course (which covered loop, reversement, spin, steep turns).
  4. Lower harness belt unbuckled: SUST possibly-contributing factor. The lower (groin) strap of the 5-point harness was not connected at the buckle; SUST suggests inattention before takeoff. This may have allowed the pilot's seating position to shift during inversion, and/or allowed the lead-shot ballast cushion (placed between seat pan and seat cushion) to slide and impair the controls. SUST does not draw a firm conclusion.
  5. Recovery by dive instead of roll: Faced with an unstable inverted attitude with the nose already dropping, the pilot chose to recover by diving out (toward upright via a steep descent) rather than completing the half-roll back to upright. SUST lists this as a contributing factor: "Fehlentscheid beim Übergang in die normale Fluglage".
  6. Airbrakes not deployed: During the resulting steep descent toward the ground, the pilot did not extend the airbrakes (which on the B4 are cleared up to VNE). SUST contributing factor.
  7. VNE exceeded — wing breakup: VNE (240 km/h) was significantly exceeded. Torsional overload at high speed tore the leading-edge skin between ribs 3-6 and sheared the rivets. The left wing was torn upward and broke off; the right wing was torn off, taking the main spar fitting with it; the fuselage broke at the main bulkhead. The aircraft disintegrated into four main parts at about 400-500 m AGL.
  8. No bail-out attempt — fatal: The cockpit forward section, with the pilot still strapped in, fell to the ground. The pilot carried a rescue parachute but made no attempt to leave the cockpit. The pilot was fatally injured; the glider was destroyed. SUST does not speculate on why the bail-out was not attempted.
Loading incidents...
Select Incident
Select Report
Filter
0/0
Incident year
1997 2024
Sort By
Search
0/0
Preferences
Save preferences locally
Enable map view
Language
Theme
About

gliderincidents.com gathers and lists soaring incident reports from official sources. The sources are indicated and linked. These reports are amended by summaries, metadata and translations, some of which have been generated utilizing machine learning (AI). You shouldn't trust the information provided here blindly, and consider reading the official incident report as a fact-check.

OR AND
Flight Phase
Circumstance
Severity Levels
Countries

Please describe what information is incorrect or needs review:

Bookmarked