Escape turn from sink at low speed stalls LS 8-18 into ridge

Obergoms, Switzerland Rolladen-Schneider LS 8-18

The pilot of an LS 8-18 was seriously injured during a soaring flight near Ulrichen in the Walliser Alps and the glider was destroyed. After an early release at about 2,200 m MSL to avoid traffic, the pilot flew ridge figure-8s on an unfamiliar slope at about 112 km/h. Lift stopped unexpectedly and the aircraft entered sink. The pilot initiated a 180 degree reversal turn but airspeed fell below the minimum flying speed; with the aft CG — a tail battery had been left installed — aggravating wing drop, the LS 8-18 lost control near the ground and struck the mountainside. Aft CG and a low-speed reversal in sink drove the stall close to terrain.

  1. Aerotow, early release at Geschinergale: At 13:11 LT on 25 July 2013 the pilot launched the LS 8-18 (HB-3287) on aerotow behind a Super-Dimona from RWY 05 of Münster (LSPU) for a conservative local flight in the Walliser Alps. About 3 km before the planned release point at the Galmihornhütte, around 2,200 m MSL, he released early near the Geschinergale, 1.5 km abeam the unused Ulrichen RWY 05, to avoid the expected congestion of gliders at the planned area.
  2. Aft CG: tail battery installed: The pilot's preferred loading for the LS 8-18 used no nose trim weights and no battery in the tail. On this flight a tail battery was installed (a fact the pilot noted during preflight). Cockpit load was 85.8 kg against a 85 kg minimum, putting the in-flight centre of gravity at 397 mm aft of the reference plane — at the upper end of the 280–400 mm permitted range. An aft CG increases the risk of wing drop at low speed and a developing spin after a stall.
  3. Early release in unfamiliar area: Releasing early at the Geschinergale offered the tactical advantage of avoiding a crowded thermalling area. The disadvantage: the pilot had little altitude and time to assess local conditions in the Ulrichengale area, which he did not know from earlier flights as a thermal entry point.
  4. Lift stops, sink at Ulrichengale: After short search at the Geschinergale, the pilot moved over the crest to the Ulrichengale and started ridge figure-8s along its south-east corner at a ground speed averaging 112 km/h (about 10–15 % above best L/D). Intending to extend the second figure-8 into the Obertal side valley, he unexpectedly lost lift and the aircraft entered a stronger sink area. The last FLARM point at 13:19:46 LT shows the LS 8-18 at about 2,200 m MSL near the end of the first figure-8.
  5. Low-speed 180° reversal turn: Surprised by the sink, with little height above terrain and a rising slope ahead, the pilot was unable to gain speed. He immediately initiated a 180° reversal turn (Fluchtkurve) toward better ground and noted a reduced speed margin during the manoeuvre.
  6. Wing drops near ridge: Past about 180° of the turn the right wing dropped toward the slope. Airspeed had very probably fallen below the minimum flying speed; with the aft CG aggravating wing drop, the LS 8-18 entered an unrecovered stall close to the ground. The 100 m of altitude needed to exit a developed spin per the flight manual was not available.
  7. Mountain impact, serious injury: The LS 8-18 struck a steep east-facing slope of more than 30° about 2 km north of Ulrichen at 2,170 m MSL, nose first. The cockpit absorbed energy in soft ground, the wreck slid about 19.5 m below the impact point. The pilot was seriously injured but conscious and used his mobile phone to alert a colleague; REGA and Air Zermatt were on scene at 14:10. The LS 8-18 was destroyed.
Loading incidents...
Select Incident
Select Report
Filter
0/0
Incident year
1997 2024
Sort By
Search
0/0
Preferences
Save preferences locally
Enable map view
Language
Theme
About

gliderincidents.com gathers and lists soaring incident reports from official sources. The sources are indicated and linked. These reports are amended by summaries, metadata and translations, some of which have been generated utilizing machine learning (AI). You shouldn't trust the information provided here blindly, and consider reading the official incident report as a fact-check.

OR AND
Flight Phase
Circumstance
Severity Levels
Countries

Please describe what information is incorrect or needs review:

Bookmarked